CIOB voices quality fears over planning white paper

The Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) has voiced fears that the government’s “landmark” planning reforms detailed in a white paper entitled Planning for the Future could harm the quality of new housing developments.

The CIOB warned that there are “clear impacts” on
the quality of residential conversions created through permitted development
rights (PDRs), with many failing to meet national space standards, lacking
amenity space and suffering from low quality design and poor locations.

It added that high volumes of PDRs have wide ranging impacts
on transport, community facilities, play space and green space, and without
Section 106 agreements or Community Infrastructure Levy contributions to offset
the costs associated with provision of community infrastructure, local
authorities are further financially burdened.

The CIOB also voiced fears that PDR risked jeopardising the public’s trust by creating poor-quality accommodation as standard, in spite of all the work the construction industry has done to reform poast-Grenfell.

It urged the government to avoid “sleep walking”
into a policy regime that it said will “produce yet more misery and
tragedy for occupants”. It said in a statement: “It is vital that the
proposed changes to the planning system do not put quantity before the long
term quality, character and accessibility of our built environment.”

Eddie Tuttle, director of policy, research and public
affairs at the CIOB, said: “The white paper published today highlights the need
for reform of the planning system in order to build the homes we desperately
need. But we are concerned the government’s focus on extending permitted
development rights, including the ability to demolish and rebuild commercial
and residential buildings on existing sites without a full planning —if
implemented without significant safeguards—will lock in more unacceptable
standard development, the consequences of which we will live with for
generations or must rectify later at greater expense.”